Притензии от World Intellectual Property Organization

[MasterNames.net]

Я зарегистрировал дроп в зоне .org, домен содержит ТМ одной крупной компании ( домен не полностью тм , а только содержит имя бренда)
Дней через 10 пришло письмо от владельцев ТМ:

 

Dear Sirs
Please find attached a Complaint (and Annexes) in electronic form in the subject matter.
This Complaint is submitted to the Center in electronic form - paperless party filings;
see details under: http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/art...icle_0057.html
A corresponding copy is herewith also sent to the concerned Respondent and Registrar.
With best regards

через пару дней после это пришло письмо от domain.disputes@wipo.int

 

Dear Complainant,



Further to our Acknowledgment of Receipt of Complaint, please be advised of the following:



The registrant of the disputed domain name in the above referenced proceeding has been identified by the concerned Registrar DomainContext, Inc. as being different to the entity named in the Complaint as Respondent. The registrant information we have received from the Registrar is as follows:



Registrant Name:-==Tut moi dannie=--

Registrant Organization:N/A

Registrant Street1:-==Tut moi dannie=--

Registrant Street3:

Registrant City:-==Tut moi dannie=--

Registrant State/Province:-==Tut moi dannie=--

Registrant FAX:

Registrant FAX Ext.:

Registrant Email:-==Tut moi dannie=--





Please be advised that this invitation is not being issued by the Center as a formal deficiency under the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (Rules), and that you are not being required by the Center to file an amendment to the Complaint (or an Amended Complaint) in light of the same in order to proceed with the Complaint as filed.



If you choose not to accept this invitation to file an amendment to the Complaint (or Amended Complaint), we would ask that you confirm your election to proceed with your Complaint without amendment by August 7, 2010.



If you should choose to accept the invitation and file an amendment to the Complaint (or an Amended Complaint) in light of the provided information, we would ask that you do so by August 7, 2010.



If you so choose to amend the Complaint, with a view to notification of the Complaint and implementation of any Decision under the Policy and Rules, we suggest that any such amendment should at a minimum contain the additional information which has been provided by the Registrar (as provided above). While such amendment is commonly made by the simple addition of the newly identified registrant to the Complaint (i.e., in addition to the original named Respondent), any final determination as to the proper identity of the Respondent(s) will be at the sole discretion of the Panel to be appointed in this case.



We note also that any such amendment may have consequences for mutual jurisdiction and communications, and that the corresponding mutual jurisdiction and communications paragraphs of the Complaint may need to be addressed in any such amendment to the Complaint. You may also consider amending the facts and arguments in the Complaint in light of the above. Any submission by you to the Center as a result of this notice must be signed and should be copied to the Respondent(s) as named therein and the concerned Registrar.



Should the Center not receive any such amendment (or alternately, your confirmation that you elect not to file an amendment) by August 7, 2010, we will proceed to formal Complaint Notification on the assumption that you chose not to make an amendment to the Complaint in light of this notice. For avoidance of doubt regarding the Center's notification obligations under the Policy and Rules and to preserve the Panel’s discretion (on appointment) to consider any Respondent identity issues, the Center will nevertheless provide a copy of the Complaint both to the Respondent as currently named in the Complaint, and to the registrant contact details subsequently disclosed by the Registrar.



To the extent that the Center’s recommendation would be sought in this regard, it would be (if only to avoid potential decision implementation issues) to amend the Complaint in light of the disclosed information. While the decision to amend (or not) is at the discretion of the Complainant at this stage of the proceedings, we would note that it is also within an appointed Panel’s discretion to require such amendment (and/or further procedural steps) at a later stage.



If you have any questions and would like to discuss any of the above, please do not hesitate to contact us.



Sincerely,



Ty Gray

Case Manager

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center



Please note that from December 14, 2009, the WIPO Center offers a facility for paperless party filings in UDRP cases. Further information is available on our website at http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/, including at http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/art...icle_0057.html and http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/rules/eudrp/. Model pleadings for use by WIPO parties under this new facility are available at http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/c...ant/index.html and http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/r...ent/index.html.



The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center is an international provider of non-profit services for the out-of-court resolution of commercial disputes. The Center specializes in cases arising out of technology and intellectual property transactions, such as licensing, R&D and distribution agreements.

WIPO arbitration, mediation and expert determination contract clauses: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/clauses/

WIPO Internet domain name dispute resolution: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/

регистратор(DC) локнул домен до окончания разбирательства
Домен мной никак не использовался , dns были регистратора

Подскажите - чем это всё грозит ?
1) что домены можно забирать без решения суда ?
2) с доменом можно попрощаться ?
3) если не сложно опишите суть ситуации ...